Of course the debate started right up, you can follow the thread through replies. It's plainly obvious the shots were just placed on top of what was already there and the staged pics haven't gotten much less obvious since then.
If you read through posts about this stock from back then, prior to the first R/S, it's not only amazing that the same BS was being pushed that's being pushed now, but people were criticizing it and pointing out the failings for the same reasons they are now! They were even ridiculing the stock for being only a few ticks above .0001 and that was before a 1000:1 reverse split.
Nothing's changed. There's still people making excuses for everything and saying that if you can't technically prove what you say (and what's quite obvious), then it must not be true. People who don't want to look to the past don't want anyone to see that the same BS that was happpening then is still happening. It didn't lead anywhere then and it's not leading anywhere now except to a higher share count.