So if we go by the established rules, what do you define as spam.
What I may think is or is not spam is irrelevant. If the Board Chair thinks it is spam, it can be deleted and then reviewed by Matt. Whatever he decides is the end of the story. If the Board Chair does not think it is spam, at least not to the extent of deleting it, then why should anyone else care.
And to suggest filtering is the answer, is an error in judgement on your part.
Is this the way that the EDIG faithful talk about the issues without making things personal? That aside, why do you think it is an error in judgment? Because it is not the favored ego satisfying solution of "winning by exclusion" over someone they dislike that some want?
Sheesh.....no wonder that board seems to be such a mess.
Troy
Those who shoot from the hip usually end up just shooting themselves.
Plan the grub and grub the plan.
Where is the party tonight? Who is bringng the drinks?