Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,822.58
(
0.08%
)
US TECH 100
24,472.40
(
0.12%
)
Dow Jones
47,744.56
(
-0.36%
)
Brent Oil
97.63
(
-2.23%
)
Bitcoin
72,333.39
(
2.20%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 98356
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

wbmw

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 29
Posts 25865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2002

wbmw

Member Level

Re: CombJelly post# 61261

Thursday, 08/25/2005 12:58:18 PM

Thursday, August 25, 2005 12:58:18 PM

Post# of 98356
Combjelly, I disagree.

Intel demoed a ton of 65nm products and made a lot of noise. AMD's 65nm absence made them look behind. The dual core Turion demo was a joke. Everyone knows it's going to be nearly twice the power dissipation of current Turion chips (which would defeat the purpose), or be clocked incredibly slow just to meet the power envelopes (which would be performance uncompetitive).

AMD loves to counter Intel PR in any way they possibly can. If they had 65nm anything at this point, it would have been on prominent display.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent AMD News
More AMD News