Thursday, April 26, 2012 4:52:55 PM
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BOOCK
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
v.
IRWIN BOOCK, STANTON B.J. DEFREITAS, NICOLETTE D. LOISEL, ROGER L. SHOSS and JASON C. WONG, Defendants, and
BIRTE BOOCK and 1621533 ONTARIO, INC., Relief Defendants.
No. 09 Civ. 8261 (DLC).
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
August 25, 2011.
If you look up the case online, Google "SEC v. Boock, Defreitas, Loisel, Shoss, and Wong," you will find Level Vision mentioned on the list of "Hijacked Companies."
If the stock was fraudulently issued, then would that not mean that "LVLV" stock is in fact worthless, regardless of whether or not Level Vision is currently a functioning company? Also, have any of the company officers ever commented on their stock or the above case?
It would seem quite absurd for Level Vision leadership to be unaware of the above case in which their company was involved. Why then would they tell investors that their stock may again become tradeable if the stock in question was issued fraudulently by an outside party?
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM