A. I don't know why you are worried about where my money was.... but don't you fret... I did alright where I had it. And what I had left here, I sold off into the strength.
B.
Look sales from clothes is great but the only way were getting to .50 is by selling a poop load of supplements...its that simple.
No... it is not that simple. Look at the number of shares and multiply it by .50. Compare it to other companies at that level. Not likely without a R/S or share buyback. Now that we have returned from Willy Wonka land, lets discuss reality.
This is a struggling company... don't believe me? Read the financials. This is a struggling company. To throw away a revenue stream that is potentially 5-25% of all of your revenue is stupid unless there is a really really really really good reason. Do you know what the margin on a t-shirt is? (Well, I am guessing you do because I am guessing you are Drew or somehow related to MSLP in a meaningful way). Unless they have the ability to poop Hondos(which they don't... once again, read the financials)... they should be paying attention to all possible revenue streams.
Oh... and they don't sell anything directly to customers, they don't manufacture anything, they don't seem to store anything, they don't really seem to own anything material... they are really basically a marketing company... that relies on brand to make money. If one distributor or manufacturer decides to stop making or selling their product... the dream is over. MSLP is out of business. They are, right now, a one trick pony and that pony COMPLETELY relies on very few other businesses.
The management may have been acting like their lives were a rap video, but the reality is that they were being funded by toxic financing and dilution. To a company that basically doubled the number of shares.. they need to collect as many millions as possible... not throw them in the garbage.
While it is NOT exactly clear what the arrangement was, if it was Musclepharm Sportswear... they are basically paying more money because it is their buddy.. or perhaps more dubious reasons. That is not right for the shareholders.... it is absolutely wrong. If you combine the terrible deal with the lack of disclosure, some could argue that it is a SEC violation.