News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257262
Next 10
Followers 77
Posts 4790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: oc631 post# 140547

Friday, 04/20/2012 2:53:15 PM

Friday, April 20, 2012 2:53:15 PM

Post# of 257262
At a meta level suggest that you actually research before dis(miss)ing

Why did BMY withdraw the late-stage, head-to-head study between Peg-lambda and Peg-Alfa?



A- They were unable to enroll patients. Nobody wants to use that shit.


Last lambda trial enrolled WAY faster than expected

Lambda arguably has lower SAE than some DAAs


B- The cost of running the late-stage study couldn't be justified since BMY realises the market is going oral.

It might - but then why are they funding clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01309932


C- BMY was worried Lambda would show inferior efficacy and/or safety in the head-to-head late-stage trial.

Not likely - the ph iia interim was pretty unequivocal as showing meaningfully better efficacy and meaningfully lesser SAE than ifn-a.

Again, the point isn't that Lambda is a lock. Only that there is expected value owed to having a potentially sizable niche all to itself - vs the dog-eat-dog world of DAAs and the potential surprises of a DAA-only regimen.




Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today