News Focus
News Focus
Followers 16
Posts 976
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2010

Re: Sparks100 post# 19373

Wednesday, 04/11/2012 11:19:12 AM

Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:19:12 AM

Post# of 130765
considering the probable intentions and targets of PWC I can only agree with you.
to repeat it: we are shareholders in a company with "no bid"; but only us, the actual shareholders, have the majority of votes. that´s our capital.
the other side is represented by PWC; PWC wants as much as possible back of the debt. we have to vote about every proposal, and that´s our only weapon.
I would like to propose another possibility another company (also pink sheets) uses to pay back the debt without selling lots of new shares as a consequence of a R/S and without the terrible consequences for the actual shareholders.
that company and its noteholders have agreed to a "debt release and exchange agreement", i.e. they have agreed to exchange all debt and interest for the royalty payment of 10% of any revenues generated from the sale of their products. the royalty payment shall remain in effect until the payment is made by the company in the amount of 150% of the remaining unpaid principal balances.
if there is such a wonderful product with a market of 3.5 bil US-$, EPGL could pay back the debt easily.
result: no dilution, no R/S, nomore additional interest payments, only these royalty payments (% of the revenues), survival of the company, broad room for negotiations, the best of all worlds for the shareholders and PWC.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today