News Focus
News Focus
Followers 75
Posts 77662
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/03/2003

Re: Jar post# 3929

Monday, 02/03/2003 7:06:21 PM

Monday, February 03, 2003 7:06:21 PM

Post# of 495952
> I am giving a reasonable argument for God's existence.

I believe you think you are unfortunately I'm still not convinced as I have not made that fundamental leap of faith. Just because I can't explain something I cannot substitute god in that equation and say that the answer.

You seem to think that god had to create matter and that our current understanding of physics, which is being challenged with new data and adding more knowledge to it constantly. There are many parts of the universe which we know we don't understand and parts of our world we don't know what we don't understand.

You seem to feel comfortable with filling in the blanks with god. Yet 100 years ago we had not discovered much of the physics in which you rely your first premise. So in a time line your 1 premise could not be proved without a "leap of faith" by your definition 500 years ago. I guess we agree to disagree.

"Women who seek to be equal to men lack ambition."



William Hung is to American Idol as Sarah Palin is to the Vice Presidency

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today