InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 65
Posts 9634
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/31/2004

Re: fuagf post# 168748

Tuesday, 02/28/2012 9:46:44 PM

Tuesday, February 28, 2012 9:46:44 PM

Post# of 502037
fuagf, thanks for your reply ...

You provided me with interesting reading as usual ... .

I do NOT agree with Peter Gleick's definition of SCIENCE.
Gleick is an intellectual THUG who believes that SCIENCE
is a form of democracy, a Rule by Consensus among the
Scientists. He wouldn't feel this way if he was in the 10%
who disagreed with a popular Consensus.

I believe Science is a body of knowledge that has been
established by, and only by, the Scientific Method.

The Law of Gravity has been established via experimentation,
and NOT by a Consensus among Scientists.

In my opinion, Richard Lindzen, NOT Peter Gleick, has the
proper attitude toward Science and scientific research.


Because Koz is "America's Rude Awakening," the comments of Koz contain adult language and psychological nudity; reader discretion is advised.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.