StockCharts Support Forum

[Scarecrow]

Hey katka,

I read your post, and then reread it, and then read it again.

I agree that humour and sarcasm (it's not-so-nice distant cousin) have their place on StockCharts.com's Public Charts lists. Heck, they have their place everywhere. But quality, timeliness and relevance all become issues very quickly. I might find something to be absolutely hilarious and someone else doesn't think so at all. And vice versa. For example:

"A man walked into a bar. The second one ducked." (haha)

As far as voting goes... I peruse the Public Charts lists often, mostly to see if anyone has come up with something new and different. I appreciate clarity and simplicity, and vote for those lists that demonstrate such. However, I am hesitant to vote for a list for which the owner is fishing or even pleading for votes. I believe the work should speak for itself.

You specifically asked, katka, so I wanted to take the time to hopefully, respectfully reply.

Good luck and keep up the good work!

Matt

P.S. By the way, I believe spelling does matter -- to me it demonstrates an attention to detail.