News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257262
Next 10
Followers 91
Posts 20563
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: biomaven0 post# 136944

Sunday, 02/12/2012 8:34:06 PM

Sunday, February 12, 2012 8:34:06 PM

Post# of 257262
I think that's pretty unlikely myself - more likely they impose a royalty payment aside from any damages.

I do not get that argument at all.

If the court sides with MNTA, then they are entitled to damages for the previous period.

Forward going, the court can impose a royalty solution, but it must be at least sufficient to compensate the plaintiff to where they would be w/o the infringement. That is the law.

Now going to the actual case, I fail to see how a royalty can ever work as a court imposed action. It would be so high that A&W would have to sell at a loss.

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now