Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,368.85
(
-1.67%
)
US TECH 100
22,405.20
(
-2.38%
)
Dow Jones
45,166.64
(
-1.73%
)
Brent Oil
106.89
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
66,907.82
(
0.86%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257302
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

zipjet

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 36
Posts 2637
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/06/2003

zipjet

Re: iwfal post# 136917

Sunday, 02/12/2012 4:21:14 PM

Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:21:14 PM

Post# of 257302

I will take money from on-going revenue any day over the prospect of a distant court win. And for now we are back to betting on court outcomes.



Let me try again.

(1) I will take money from on-going revenue

(2) the prospect of a distant court win.


By #1 I am referring to the income from mL that MNTA had before the infringement less the income they now have post infringement.

Thus, #1 is now represented by #2. That is MNTA must look to the courts and seek damages to recover equivalent damages.

ij

It is astonishing what foolish things one can temporarily believe if one thinks too long alone ... where it is often impossible to bring one's ideas to a conclusive test either formal or experimental. J.M. Keynes

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today