News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257295
Next 10
Followers 36
Posts 2637
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/06/2003

Re: DewDiligence post# 136872

Saturday, 02/11/2012 4:35:59 PM

Saturday, February 11, 2012 4:35:59 PM

Post# of 257295

Texaco was able to settle with Pennzoil for “only” $3B (about 30 cents on the dollar including punitive damages) because Texaco filed for bankruptcy prior to requesting an appeal. The bankruptcy filing was necessitated by Texaco’s having insufficient net assets (prior to the filing) to post the bond for the appeal.



Sounds about right.

If I have this right, Texaco could have paid the full judgment, the stock kept trading even after filing bankruptcy, and the company prospered even after paying the $3B.

My point is when judgments are BIG even companies that can pay, don't. Applied to Amphistar, they won't pay if the damages are anywhere near what we think appropriate. They won't pay because they can't. WPI is the other case. They won't pay in full because the the litigation risk and time delays will entice the parties to settle if MNTA/NVS ever get a BIG JE.


It is astonishing what foolish things one can temporarily believe if one thinks too long alone ... where it is often impossible to bring one's ideas to a conclusive test either formal or experimental. J.M. Keynes

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today