"More generally, however, higher levels of political activity turn out to be correlated with lower company value." [...] "Why should this be the case? After all, the conventional wisdom is that companies are profit-maximizing machines that would only invest in politics if it were likely to make them more profitable. It's hard in a regression to isolate causation, but it seems likely that corporate political activity, like expensive toilets [ http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2009/01/23/deal-journal-explainer-the-35000-commode-outrage/ ] and shower curtains [ http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/manufacturing/2002-08-07-tyco-ceo-money_x.htm ], is a form of executive consumption that comes at the expense of shareholders. For one thing, higher levels of political activity are correlated with weak shareholder governance" your link .. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/01/citizens-united-turns-2-and-its-still-wrong/251706/ m.static.newsvine.com/servista/imagesizer?file=null0EF7F784-D3AE-EA36-FA6A-533849E77DAB.jpg&width=600 m.static.newsvine.com/servista/imagesizer?file=null25DE2C18-FA8D-FE2D-F55A-38FA631C5C43.jpg&width=600