Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,824.21
(
-0.01%
)
US TECH 100
24,456.00
(
0.20%
)
Dow Jones
47,967.33
(
-0.45%
)
Brent Oil
95.03
(
0.61%
)
Bitcoin
72,769.43
(
1.37%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257375
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

jq1234

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 69
Posts 4516
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/13/2009

jq1234

Re: iwfal post# 135452

Sunday, 01/22/2012 2:01:49 AM

Sunday, January 22, 2012 2:01:49 AM

Post# of 257375
I am not sure about ex's math. It's tough to say. 10 out of 33 triple negative is significantly higher than the general breast cancer population at around 15% already. Thus, it is quite possible they just retested and confirmed the samples they already knew as triple negative BC.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today