News Focus
News Focus
Followers 34
Posts 3335
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/23/2005

Re: chisox pat post# 3589

Saturday, 07/23/2005 12:52:09 PM

Saturday, July 23, 2005 12:52:09 PM

Post# of 92056
Chisox, the DD in finding the ammendment was good DD, but you are now overreaching to conclusions that are not based on fact.
We all know that going strictly by last quarterly filings is not good DD and is always lagging even if you are talking about a fortune 500 company. Current info is often obtained through other sources including PR's or whatever. To claim that the company is diluting when their PR's and communications with company officers and IR say the opposite I think should be defined as bashing, as you have less than nothing to back up those facts in the face of all communications saying the opposite. Unless this is a complete 100% scam, which it is reasonable to think it is not with the associations this company has, you are now as I said, "overreaching conclusions" and off base. Your DD was welcome, but you need to keep it real.

regards

There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. **Soren kierkegaard

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y