News Focus
News Focus
Followers 161
Posts 5310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2009

Re: A deleted message

Wednesday, 01/11/2012 9:51:55 PM

Wednesday, January 11, 2012 9:51:55 PM

Post# of 749756
voo -- how about this...

Claw and others have a legitimate material and factual, point, backed up by the EC making exactly the same point, that the 70/30% is only proposed, and a legitimate unknown as to the final. And won't be known until after you vote, and we enter the POR Confirmation hearings.

The 70/30% issue was mentioned in court today, and the court basically punted it over to the POR confirmation hearing -- eg, meaning it's just not decided yet. (And the 30% has changed now, due to DimeQ's -- another 8.7% was shaved off of that)

And we'll all be voting, knowing it's still out there.

Those that want to accept it as being a legitimate risk, and factor it into their investments, can do so.

Those who don't think it matters a bit -- for whatever reason, don't have to factor it in.

But to tell Claw not to discuss it -- or even to blow it off as if it doesn't exist -- that's probably dangerous, as the EC discusses it, and it is an unknown into the future. And the court acknowledges it.

Fair enough?

...Catz


.... Please, just call me Catz ;) - - - - - {and the requisite, all IMHO, do your own due diligence, and make your own investments}

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today