News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1177
Posts 134793
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/27/2003

Re: Warhorse post# 153775

Friday, 01/06/2012 9:40:47 AM

Friday, January 06, 2012 9:40:47 AM

Post# of 312102
Dead wrong. The overwhelming majority of these types of cases, and ones far far worse, never see a court room.

And the books weren't "juiced" -- the "juicing" for the 10,000th time referred to the pro forma numbers. Pro forma numbers by their definition, almost literally, means "numbers you juice" because there are no GAAP rules (even the complaint explains this to you) or any rules for pro forma numbers.

pro for·ma
Accounting . indicating hypothetical financial figures based on previous business operations for estimate purposes: a pro forma balance sheet.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro+forma

There's nothing illegal about "juicing" pro forma numbers. If that's the best they got, this case would be laughed out of a court room by a jury. It will likely go the route that 95% of other cases go -- aka settelment.

Raw

Research & analysis on some of my favorite stocks is located on the sticky note on the SwingTrade board.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=1781

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y