InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251721
Next 10
Followers 826
Posts 119569
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: floblu14 post# 133806

Sunday, 12/25/2011 11:46:05 AM

Sunday, December 25, 2011 11:46:05 AM

Post# of 251721
BAX is certainly big enough to carry out its duties in the MNTA collaboration; the question is whether BAX is good enough to do it, and this post from 2010 shows why I have some doubts (#msg-52567644):

BAX appears to be jinxed. They were the main target of the contaminated Chinese heparin in 2008, they botched the manufacturing of Gammagard IVIG and HALO’s Hylenex, and they recently had to write off $600M for an FDA recall of defective infusion pumps that BAX had still not fixed four years after the problem was discovered.

Maybe none of the above is indicative of the success in FoB’s that BAX will ultimately have with MNTA, but I think it’s naïve to assume that BAX will be a great partner just because Craig Wheeler says so.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.