News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257657
Next 10
Followers 5
Posts 997
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/29/2010

Re: DewDiligence post# 133761

Friday, 12/23/2011 9:09:37 PM

Friday, December 23, 2011 9:09:37 PM

Post# of 257657

I would have preferred to see MNTA ink more lucrative terms in a deal for one or two FoB’s rather than a somewhat less lucrative deal that incorporates as many as six FoB’s and has a large number of moving parts.

And, unless I read things wrong, BAX has first right of refusal on products beyond 6 - meaning (to me) that the terms agreed to today, be they good, bad, or indifferent, will apply if BAX wants in on future "stuff".

That doesn't leave MNTA in a good negotiating position, once, as I presume will eventually happen, Mr. Market establishes a higher pps because MNTA will have better "proven" its value.

Your (and anyone else's) comments appreciated.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today