InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253566
Next 10
Followers 5
Posts 997
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/29/2010

Re: DewDiligence post# 133761

Friday, 12/23/2011 9:09:37 PM

Friday, December 23, 2011 9:09:37 PM

Post# of 253566

I would have preferred to see MNTA ink more lucrative terms in a deal for one or two FoB’s rather than a somewhat less lucrative deal that incorporates as many as six FoB’s and has a large number of moving parts.

And, unless I read things wrong, BAX has first right of refusal on products beyond 6 - meaning (to me) that the terms agreed to today, be they good, bad, or indifferent, will apply if BAX wants in on future "stuff".

That doesn't leave MNTA in a good negotiating position, once, as I presume will eventually happen, Mr. Market establishes a higher pps because MNTA will have better "proven" its value.

Your (and anyone else's) comments appreciated.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.