News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257580
Next 10
Followers 77
Posts 4790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: DewDiligence post# 133623

Thursday, 12/22/2011 8:02:53 PM

Thursday, December 22, 2011 8:02:53 PM

Post# of 257580
MNTA -

I’m fine with the financial terms



First thoughts: I am surprised by the boards general response that 'these terms look ok'. I doubt anyone yesterday would have predicted substantially lower terms than MNTA is getting on Copaxone - and they are a lot lower unless you assume that the competition will be very fierce (i.e. price is driven so low that GM is well under 50%). And I am reasonably certain I was as pessimistic as anyone about the amount of competition - since I assumed the non-subs biosimilars hit the market well before MNTAs generic and take market that cannot be easily recovered just because it is fully subs. But even I assumed that there would be only one fully replaceable generic. I think this set of royalties implies that Big Pharma assumes more than one fully replaceable - or that Momenta's drugs are NOT allowed to be fully substitutible and thus have full competition. And Momenta couldn't convince them otherwise. The only thing I don't understand in this scenario is why Momenta agreed to a total of 6 subs biologics unless they too share this view of the biosimilar market.

In any case I can see why they bought the bio-better patent in the last month - if the general consensus is that the competition will be brutal.

More thoughts later (may be MUCH later)

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today