Is InvestorsHub really going to destroy their site with this ill-advised "Open Moderators" move recently?
Dan-- I have already seen well-moderated boards full apart these few days as Bashing Moderators are changing i-Box information to fit their own agenda. And when the original moderator tries to put up the balanced view with real info, it gets changed by the bashing moderator.
iHUB has, in one single move, abandoned the ONE thing that differentiated the message boards here with other boards.
I strongly urge iHUB reconsider this move. Why would ANY moderator do any "free" work moderating when you can have the most disruptive people actually become "moderators"?
Why would I even go to iHUB any more when the boards have been taken over by negativity? A new subscriber wants to come to iHUB to glean what he can in DD on small companies. Now, you are just going to have arguments and worthless posts as 6 --SIX!!!--moderators delete posts they do not like. Add BS to i=BOX. Why not go to another message board
I predict that iHUB's paying subscriber base will plummet now. Just watch. Why go to iHUB now that it is headed to being a worthless battleground of different aliases trying to pump==on the positive side and, most likely, an investors's side--or bash--on the shorters' side?
Yes, you could have a moderator that went overboard by deleting the negative viewpoint. But those posts were reinstated by iHUB. If iHUB is thinking that they wanted to do less work (or maybe with less headcount), it was a bad move, IMO. There will be MORE work as iHUB spiral into chaos and their revenues drop.
