Tenchu this is from your orginal post:
The charge over the compiler is outrageous, especially when AMD claims it "degrades" performance on AMD processors. That implies an active effort by Intel to handicap performance, which is ludicrous.
I was just trying to show you that it is possible that a person could come to a different conclusion based on whats out there. In this one instance some code would segfault on AMD based systems, yet run fine on Intel systems. Well in this instance it was just an Intel bug which seems to have been fixed. The problem I have is that if anyone posts anything over here showing that it is possible that AMD did not completely make up every single complaint, well we all know how that person is treated. That person is a deslusional AMDroid living in the Matrix and has no idea what is really going on and needs tin hats to stop the mind control or whatever....
is there something in my post you would like to disagree with Its very difficult to disagree with you. For if I do then I'm just again...Droid blah blah blah. But I don't disagree with what you said in your post.
or are you just going to cover your ears and pretend I'm the one exaggerating the facts? No, I'm not going to do that, and I don't know any facts. Never said that I did. To you the facts are that Intel didn't do anything to handicap AMD. To Doug Intel did do something to handicap AMD.
Smallpops
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
