News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257257
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122795
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: kris_kade post# 132061

Wednesday, 11/30/2011 12:57:36 AM

Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:57:36 AM

Post# of 257257

[Quiz answer]—Due to inventory reserves of older generation product?

Basically correct. Under the co-marketing agreement BSX has with ABT on the Promus stent (as opposed to the new Promus Element stent), BSX has to submit non-refundable purchase orders to ABT well in advance of delivery.

When the FDA approved Promus Element sooner than BSX expected, BSX was stuck with $40M of purchase orders for Promus that BSX no longer needed or wanted, and they are writing off the entire $40M.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now