News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257295
Next 10
Followers 45
Posts 3206
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/29/2003

Re: jq1234 post# 131174

Wednesday, 11/16/2011 1:48:12 AM

Wednesday, November 16, 2011 1:48:12 AM

Post# of 257295
I don't see any reason to think MDVN could not have licensed ex-US only. They would be far from the first to have leverage to sign such a deal. Alternatively, if for some reason you're right and MDV-3100 was unpartnerable unless they licensed WW only, the early data was compelling enough, they should have held. If MDV-3100 failed, the stock would have been going to liquidation value either way. Licensing out WW was nice but will turn out to be somewhat value degrading. I always prefer to invest in companies that retain all rights or most. Just the opinion of a pipe dream investor.

P.S. Cougar was acquired for $1b not $894m and your comparison is a bit biased since Cougar sold out pre pivotal data. It was a risk averse but rational decision at the time, since of course failure and the stock would have gone to zero.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today