News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257578
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: jb_118 post# 131140

Tuesday, 11/15/2011 7:14:23 PM

Tuesday, November 15, 2011 7:14:23 PM

Post# of 257578
Your interpretation of the language in the SEC filing doesn’t make sense, IMO. You’re saying that MNTA would have to pony up an additional $15M for the bond in the worst-case scenario where the injunction were lifted and Amphastar launched, while I’m saying that MNTA has to pony up an additional $15M for the bond in the best-case scenario where the royalty-based period ends quickly because NVS’ sales of generic Lovenox remain strong.

The gist of the agreement, IMO, is that the more money MNTA is making, the more MNTA can afford to contribute to the bond.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today