News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257442
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122884
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biomaven0 post# 130957

Sunday, 11/13/2011 2:58:17 PM

Sunday, November 13, 2011 2:58:17 PM

Post# of 257442

…companies cannot deny [Ponatinib] to patients who are resistant/intolerant to Gleevec - that would be tantamount to killing them. So even under more restrictive reimbursement settings, the fight would be over 1st line for high-risk patients, not 2nd or 3rd-line.

You conveniently ignore that there are other second-line agents for patients who are resistant/intolerant to Gleevec.

The Sprycel patent runs until 2020. It's a novel compound, no re-patenting issues. Filings by generic companies are a dime a dozen. If BMY was truly concerned about the patent they would settle and knock a few years off the date. In the big scheme of things I don't even view this filing as a rounding error in figuring ARIA's valuation.

This is a lame response, IMO. BMY just found out about the P-IV challenge a few days ago.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today