News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257441
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122884
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biomaven0 post# 130942

Sunday, 11/13/2011 1:58:29 PM

Sunday, November 13, 2011 1:58:29 PM

Post# of 257441
I think you make a few dangerous assumptions:

[Ponatinib] sales of $500m in a few years are essentially a lock…

What if something strikes out of the blue, such as what happened to Tysabri in 2005? Tallying future pharmaceutical sales of any kind as a lock is unwise, IMO.

The generic filing on Sprycel I view as noise.

How can you say this when no one has even seen the Paragraph-IV pleadings yet? Generic Sprycel would certainly put some additional pressure on Ponatinib in the second-line setting, although we can argue about the magnitude of the effect.

Cancer treatment is not like high cholesterol - managed care can encourage the use of Gleevec, but they can't require it.

Says who? Reimbursement policy for expensive cancer drugs is in flux and could easily become more restrictive—perhaps substantially so—by the time Ponatinib is on the US market.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today