InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 1124
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/17/2011

Re: TJG post# 10294

Sunday, 11/13/2011 9:34:08 AM

Sunday, November 13, 2011 9:34:08 AM

Post# of 13679
.50 is equal to .0005 in connection with this particular stock, so I am a little lost by your comparison, we were trading as high as .002 in April pre rs, which based on the new share structure would be equal to 2.0.

So again I will confess my lack of understanding to your point.

simply put sure I would have loved for the stock price to go from .0012 (where I first bought in) to .50, with out the rs. However that didn't happen, instead the pps went down to .0001, and eventually as you know traded at .0002 which is the price the rs happened at leading to a share price of .20.

Ideally the rs would have been timed with release of positive news to promote interest in the stock which in theory would generate a rise in price.

Instead we were handed an rs with no news and a drop in value 70% below what would have been possible under the other share structure before the rs.

If the rs would have been followed with news the day before or the day trading resumed I would find merit in your statements. However as we have witnessed that has not happened and based on what I have read from the IR news will not be forthcoming in the near future, and instead of sitting on a stock which I could have at least broken even on at .00055 I am now sitting on a stock who's pps is going lower than it could have before.

Bottom line is we got the shaft, no lube, heck not even a kiss, and we are being sold a line of crap to justify our getting the shaft in the process.