Now if the ceo chooses to be a slacker or a liar, well then shame on the sec for ignoring that part (where the ceo makes ALL of the money & screws investors). You say "unfounded statements?" Well if the IR is willing to put his money where his mouth is & encourage his group, along with himself, to buy ... well then I see the IR on the investor side of the fence taking the risk (not standing aside the ceo). Artificial manipulated run ups? ... hmmm You mean the "buy on rumor, sell on news?" if investors (haphazard or not) are jumping on the band wagon to buy (with IR) & the ceo pulls the plug?
HMMMMM, who on earth wants to work for liars, scammers and thieves? Ken knows exactly what he is dealing with. It's the penny market and 99% of the people involved would skin their own grandmother for a buck. Who on earth trusts anybody in this market? Especially an IR guy who is paid to spread it on thick and heavy? Oh, Ken is different right? It's always the company or the CEO who is to blame, never Ken for pumping a POS with a crooked CEO. Ever heard of a backround check?
LMAO!!!!
