| Followers | 5 |
| Posts | 973 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 03/03/2011 |
Saturday, October 29, 2011 12:11:39 PM
Your thoughts on this FOB thread. Now that we have some proof that the courts will protect MNTA's novelty esp if no new proxy signature(and testing) is done by successor generic.
Is it reasonable to make an inference like
"On the other hand if you "choose" cell host line based on certain parameters(to prove sameness) you will likely infringe on MNTA's patent at least for NEXT 20 years-2031(This patent is fresh out of the oven.filed in October 2011) "
choosing/developing/maintaining cell host line - is this a development or commercial manufacturing activity?!?! i would envision you may need to test the host line for certain parameters from time to time so it is within tolerance of your identified parameters-hence part of commercial manufacturing
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=68478486
Cannabix Technologies Announces First Delivery of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) to a Major Construction Client • BLOZF • Mar 19, 2026 12:45 PM
ECGI Building in Crypto's Top-Performing Sector as Tokenized Real-World Assets Surge Past $26 Billion • ECGI • Mar 19, 2026 8:30 AM
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
