News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: jb_118 post# 129728

Friday, 10/28/2011 7:22:02 PM

Friday, October 28, 2011 7:22:02 PM

Post# of 257253

As you pointed out, the rationale for [Teva’s FDA approval] was never that strong anyway.

But most investors—and nearly all sell-side analysts—disagreed with my thesis that Teva’s Lovenox program was inept. Had they agreed with my thesis, MNTA’s share price would have been trading in the 30s or 40s (or higher) prior to Amphastar’s FDA approval.

It would all hang on ‘886. There's an unpatented way around ‘466.

So what? MNTA needs only one blocking patent to prevent a generic Lovenox from launching. This is not an instance where 1+1=2, but rather where 1+1=1.15 or maybe 1.2.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now