News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257580
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: jb_118 post# 129728

Friday, 10/28/2011 7:22:02 PM

Friday, October 28, 2011 7:22:02 PM

Post# of 257580

As you pointed out, the rationale for [Teva’s FDA approval] was never that strong anyway.

But most investors—and nearly all sell-side analysts—disagreed with my thesis that Teva’s Lovenox program was inept. Had they agreed with my thesis, MNTA’s share price would have been trading in the 30s or 40s (or higher) prior to Amphastar’s FDA approval.

It would all hang on ‘886. There's an unpatented way around ‘466.

So what? MNTA needs only one blocking patent to prevent a generic Lovenox from launching. This is not an instance where 1+1=2, but rather where 1+1=1.15 or maybe 1.2.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today