Apparently he thought Rash was well worth hiring and did so. I failed to point out earlier that Rash also had every opportunity to investigate Eddie before agreeing to become his employee. So maybe HE should have dug a little deeper as well. Even so, this could be a case of "two guys with the same patterns" as you put it.
Rash alleges (among many things) Eddie is in 'breach of contract' so one assumes something written exists. That's basic "Business 101."
So can anyone explain why Eddie hired him?
(Steven Rash that is) Not only did Eddie hire him but put out statements proclaiming him to be his "President," "Chief Operating Officer" and head of "Investor Relations."
I have to believe that information about Rash and his business history were available for the reading. Therefore it strikes me that either Eddie is sorely lacking when it comes to vetting prospective employees... or he knew exactly who he was hiring. Just my opinion mind you
Yes...it is the same guy and same patterns with him it seems.he needs to get a job.