InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252686
Next 10
Followers 13
Posts 325
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2008

Re: zipjet post# 129233

Monday, 10/24/2011 5:49:24 PM

Monday, October 24, 2011 5:49:24 PM

Post# of 252686
Yes, it looks like to me this puts a big dent in the PI argument. It also dramatically reduces the damages that MNTA could have potentially have claimed. And by doing so it also dramatically reduces Amphastar/Watson's risk if they decide to launch at risk, which at this point in time I believe they will given the reduced risk if the PI is not granted.

It also dramatically reduces the value of MNTA's enoxaparin IP, as keeping out a competitor now is worth in the $10s of millions per year and not hundreds of millions anymore with an AG.

All in all, a broadside hit, making this litigation less imperative, less valuable, less defining for MNTA. MNTA now has copaxone as its next big thing and enoxaparin should become baked in as a given at this point in time in regard to dramatically reduced revenues.

Talk about taking air out of the balloon. But there is no PI vs. an AG.

Tinker
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.