Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,506.48
(
-1.51%
)
US TECH 100
23,484.80
(
-0.99%
)
Dow Jones
45,577.47
(
-0.96%
)
Brent Oil
106.93
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
70,611.00
(
0.13%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257266
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

oldberkeley

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 58
Posts 5142
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2007

oldberkeley

Re: DewDiligence post# 129118

Sunday, 10/23/2011 2:29:13 PM

Sunday, October 23, 2011 2:29:13 PM

Post# of 257266

The Judge is not seeking a technical explanation from MNTA; rather, the Judge is making MNTA do the grunt work of finding legal precedents for MNTA’s interpretation of the patent claims at issue. That’s why the Judge’s Order in #msg-68232191 directs MNTA to produce a memorandum of law.

Along with your info about a Special Master, this also answers the question that Marthambles and I asked regarding a Judge's technical/scientific expertise in this kind of case.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today