News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257264
Next 10
Followers 77
Posts 4790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: zipjet post# 129115

Saturday, 10/22/2011 11:56:08 PM

Saturday, October 22, 2011 11:56:08 PM

Post# of 257264
MNTA

I am conflicted about whether a patent that makes claims using general terms like "separation method" (without specifying enablement of each alternative method)



They do in fact specify specific enablements - e.g. claim 1 is using HPLC whereas claim 2 is the same but using FPLC, ...

The judge's question appears to be about the differentiation between 'determining' and 'separation method'. It is very hard to tell why this would matter without more context - the claims themselves talk of 'determination'. One possible guess would be:

a) The judge is not clear on how you 'determine' which fragment is which (the tables in the claims list different fragments - but how do you know which is which in a HPLC separation?)

b) ?

But I don't put a lot of faith in the above guess or any other guess without seeing more of the legal dialog.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today