News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257580
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: mouton29 post# 129043

Saturday, 10/22/2011 2:27:45 PM

Saturday, October 22, 2011 2:27:45 PM

Post# of 257580
Here’s a citation indicating that the risk of a tax hit is genuine if the spun-off company is acquired immediately (or close in time) to the divestiture:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=spin%20off%20acquisition%20tax&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCMQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sutherland.com%2Ffiles%2FPublication%2F81586399-b1d3-4733-9ed6-373926382e45%2FPresentation%2FPublicationAttachment%2F5a79c22e-ad1e-4df8-af76-f8223ef16559%2FTAX355.PDF&ei=jQmjTru_Dobw0gHzru33BA&usg=AFQjCNFhAR03LkF0GNpUVXCzjeC7X1etTA&cad=rja (page 4)

The satisfaction of one or more of the Section 355 requirements can sometimes be affected by transactions or other events that occur after the spin-off. Total acquisitions of Distributing or Controlled by unrelated parties typically carry the greatest risk in this regard, especially if the acquisition occurs soon or relatively soon after the spin.

…The analysis as to the impact of post-spin developments is largely fact-intensive and tends to focus on two main inquiries: (i) How soon after the spin-off did such developments occur? and (ii) Were such developments planned or otherwise contemplated at the time of the spin-off?


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today