News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257266
Next 10
Followers 24
Posts 2252
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2007

Re: DewDiligence post# 129045

Saturday, 10/22/2011 9:12:38 AM

Saturday, October 22, 2011 9:12:38 AM

Post# of 257266
I willl be interested - but you will have to explain this example from Treasury Regulations section 1.355-7(j)

    Example 3. Hot market. (i) D is a widely-held corporation the stock of which is listed on an established market. D announces a distribution of C and distributes C pro rata to D's shareholders. By contract, C agrees to indemnify D for any imposition of tax under section 355(e) caused by the acts of C. The distribution is motivated by a desire to improve D's access to financing at preferred customer interest rates, which will be more readily available if D separates from C. At the time of the distribution, although neither D nor C has been approached by any potential acquirer of C, it is reasonably certain that soon after the distribution either an acquisition of C will occur or there will be an agreement, understanding, arrangement, or substantial negotiations regarding an acquisition of C. Corporation Y acquires C in a merger described in section 368(a)(1)(A) by reason of section 368(a)(2)(E) within six months after the distribution. The C shareholders receive less than 50 percent of the stock of Y in the exchange.

    (ii) The issue is whether the distribution of C and the acquisition of C by Y are part of a plan. No Safe Harbor applies to this acquisition. Under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, because prior to the distribution neither D nor C and Y had an agreement, understanding, arrangement, or substantial negotiations regarding the acquisition or a similar acquisition, the distribution of C by D and the acquisition of C by Y are not part of a plan under paragraph (b) of this section.



http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1/355-7

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today