Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,582.38
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
29,542.80
(
0.40%
)
Dow Jones
51,041.45
(
0.74%
)
Brent Oil
91.51
(
-0.73%
)
Bitcoin
73,537.24
(
0.00%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 20689
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

mouton29

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 24
Posts 2259
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2007

mouton29

Member Level

Re: jbog post# 6657

Wednesday, 10/19/2011 10:46:23 PM

Wednesday, October 19, 2011 10:46:23 PM

Post# of 20689

The case at this point shouldn't deal with the validity of the patents.




Why not? To prevail and get a preliminary injunction, MNTA has to show that it is likely that they will prevail on the merits. If Amphastar can convince the judge that the MNTA patents are invalid for obviousness or otherwise, seems to me that the judge cannot issue a preliminary injunction.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote