News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257268
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: iwfal post# 128847

Wednesday, 10/19/2011 9:47:36 PM

Wednesday, October 19, 2011 9:47:36 PM

Post# of 257268
Re: Drug A or drug B?

Without loss of generality, say that 100 people in this patient pool take the test; within this group of 100, there will be 1 person who actually has the disease in question.

For the 1 person with the disease, the test will generate 0.1 false negatives and 0.9 true positives (a 10% false-negative rate).

For the 99 people without the disease, the test will generate 29.7 false positives and 69.3 true negatives (a 30% false-positive rate).

Thus, the test’s positive predictive value (in this patient pool) = true positives / total positives = 0.9/(0.9+29.7) = 0.9/30.6 = 2.94%. In other words, if a person in this patient pool tests positive, the probability that he actually has the disease is 2.94%.

(Although not necessary for solving your problem, the test’s negative predictive value in this patient pool = true negatives / total negatives = 69.3/(69.3+0.1) = 69.3/69.4 = 99.86%.)

If a person who tests positive in this patient pool takes drug A, he will be killed by side effects 20% of the time and will live the other 80% of the time for a survival rate of 80%.

If he takes drug B, he will live if he either: i) does not have disease in the first place (probability 97.06%); or ii) has disease and is cured (probability 2.94% x 70% = 2.06%). The sum of these cases is 99.12%, which is the survival rate for taking drug B.

Hence, drug B is clearly the better choice.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today