News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257268
Next 10
Followers 91
Posts 20563
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: iwfal post# 128472

Friday, 10/14/2011 3:50:18 PM

Friday, October 14, 2011 3:50:18 PM

Post# of 257268

Interesting point - but would they give the punitive damages to MNTA since the stated words of the law are so different from the intent that it would be hard to say that Amphastar intentionally made unfair use of the patent?



Unless I am mistaken, intent does not play in basic damages, only treble damages.

EDIT: missed you said punitive, I agree that could be off the table.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today