AI
Wednesday, October 12, 2011 7:19:05 PM
I'm not totally happy with any of them either, but Gingrich has vast knowledge, experience and he is an outright expert on world history; a must for the job. Cain is extremely intelligent, is not insider, and what other may have you believe is not a Federal Reserve puppet; if he was he would be in the financial position he is, and he would have excelled earlier.
I would be happy with either, and even more happy with both. As for the rest of them, they are perfect examples of what's wrong with today's politics, and I think We The People have had enough of that. Paul? He tickles my fancy, gets my hopes an gets my hopes up, and then says something incredibility stupid (like Iran not being a threat) and comes across as bitter. This totally sucks, because he is about 85-90% on target. But damn, that missing percentage stuff is extremely important stuff. JMO
********
********
Progressiveness Must Die Today,
In Order That We May Be Free Tomorrow
Two Real Choices For 2012 – Cain Or Gingrich .
I would be happy with either, and even more happy with both. As for the rest of them, they are perfect examples of what's wrong with today's politics, and I think We The People have had enough of that. Paul? He tickles my fancy, gets my hopes an gets my hopes up, and then says something incredibility stupid (like Iran not being a threat) and comes across as bitter. This totally sucks, because he is about 85-90% on target. But damn, that missing percentage stuff is extremely important stuff. JMO
********
******** Progressiveness Must Die Today,
In Order That We May Be Free Tomorrow
Two Real Choices For 2012 – Cain Or Gingrich .
... Gary
Discover What Traders Are Watching
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
