InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252900
Next 10
Followers 82
Posts 4778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/27/2007

Re: iwfal post# 128105

Sunday, 10/09/2011 7:49:20 PM

Sunday, October 09, 2011 7:49:20 PM

Post# of 252900
To continue your analogy:

Amphastar uses techniques that infringe MNTA's patents to demonstrate sameness, and using these techniques, they get approval. But they also show that if they monitor their 7 (non-infringing) elves closely, they always have sameness, and going forward they manufacture using these 7 elves only.

My guess is this gets settled at some point with a high single-digit royalty. Obviously none of us can do more than guess here - we just don't know the key facts aside from all the legal uncertainty. I'm basing my prediction on the fact that while generally process-type patents don't hold up at all (there is typically some way to circumvent them), here there is the potential for huge (maybe multi-billion dollar) liability, so Amphastar/Watson will be more inclined to settle and get this over and done with.

Peter

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.