I hope #2 is that quality(conceptualizer) as Paul. Should people choose Paul and Ron follows through.. on ANY, point of his policy proposals, I see masive(relative to subsector)change. If anything #2 will have to be well in line from what I see Pauls preconcieved ideals and methods and timelines to enable some sort of "smooth change"(relative).
While that is at the heart of those whom wish Paul to not be elected(change), change does, will and always willrisk stability.
The best example (current) in the spring uprising where commerce has been reduced to the point of another social disorder. That being Hunger, ect.
My personel feelings are such that anyone wanting to be pres must be insane(if they are honest) because dishonesty currently rules the system.. due to the closed loop and zero sum aspect to human endevors.
Maybe, if losing in the election, R. Pauls premisses will be brought farther into the mainstream.
Time to check the News for the wallstreet demonstrations, see what's going on there, have a good weekend,, (hoping to see more from the demonstrators the demgoging "wall street" and getting into particulars.. CFTC, Dept of Commerce, Finra ect.)
