To be honest, what I want is irrelevant. What I would like to see is what I refered to.
I agree 100% that additional releases by the company would be meaningless if it doesn't offer possibilities to check from other sources that, whatever they do, it is for real...as per available confirmations by third parties (suppliers, customers, analysts, medias, ...).
This being said, I repeat that we most likely will only find out what this is all about, whenever the company issues credibly audited financials and the name of the firm that did it.
My point was that I do not like "excuses" put out every time someone ask for some details. Many valid questions have been raised over the last few months (granted generally by non beleivers) and there is always someone to protect the management in what I consider quite childish excuses (They are busy, I prefer them to grow the business instead of loosing time generating answers, They have more business than they can handle then why get listed ...)
For me this is still a pure speculation and all we have is some great developments announced by a company that barely exist officially. Past releases all lack verifyable details as discussed many times within the last months.
I did contact the company (V.Duff) multiple times and received polite and very kind an appropriate answers every time.
V.Duff is the only person around I was able to check somewhat (her CV is quite detailled on internet).
This being said, the last time I lost my bet (Consygen), there was also a credible player in the scheme (as we say in french cat burnt by hot water once, worries about cold water).
Anyhow, very simply, by April one the latest, we either have all the answers we want or we save whatever we can, assuming there will remain something to save.
Till then, let us hope ...
Roger
