InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253142
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: DewDiligence post# 59068

Saturday, 09/24/2011 2:16:54 PM

Saturday, September 24, 2011 2:16:54 PM

Post# of 253142

“We believe that MNTA’s technology will enable us
to uniquely demonstrate equivalence to innovative
products. Out intent is to develop FoB’s that are
not simply biosimilar but have the potential to be
biogenerics, interchangeable and substitutable
for the branded biologics.”

—Craig Wheeler, CEO (from 2/14/08 CC)

Is it your expectation that MNTA may be the only company with the technology to pursue fully-substitutable biogenerics? I think you said that MRK is already pursuing the traditional pathway; I assume they don't have the expectations to be able to produce fully-substitutable biogenerics.

If this is the case, and MNTA does show down the road that they are the only company to produce fully-substitutable biogenerics, I assume this will be a huge advantage for MNTA and whomever their partner ends up being. Is that your expectation in such a scenario or do you think the companies simply focused on biosimilars will still be able to successfully compete with fully-substitutable biogenerics on, say, pricing? E.g., I assume a biosimilar would be priced lower than a fully-substitutable biogeneric, which might allow them to successfully compete. Can't recall if we've discussed all of this before.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.