Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,624.70
(
-1.36%
)
US TECH 100
23,739.60
(
-1.63%
)
Dow Jones
46,225.15
(
-1.63%
)
Brent Oil
108.00
(
7.30%
)
Bitcoin
71,131.21
(
-3.80%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

DewDiligence

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

DewDiligence

Member Level

Re: pollyvonwog post# 127148

Thursday, 09/22/2011 4:30:22 PM

Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:30:22 PM

Post# of 257253

I assume that Amphastar knows they are infringing if they are, which brings up the question why would they spend the time/money to get their application approvable if they were just going to have to face the prospect of litigation?

In addition to what iwfal said in #msg-67343915, bear in mind that the two patents that MNTA alleges are infringed were not issued by the USPTO until Aug 2009 and Sep 2010, respectively; until then, Amphastar could not have known that it was infringing on another company’s issued patents.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now