Biotech Values

[IgnoranceIsBliss]

DewDiligence, I quickly scanned the complaint...

...unless I'm missing something, the claim is that Watson must have infringed the patent simply because they were able to solve the manufacturing dilemma that MNTA solved (and patented).

It's a logical claim, rather than one based on a smoking gun (having documents that show the use of the patented process, testimony, emails, etc).

Is that right, or am I missing something?

Thanks,
TGW