That's correct. But Wallace cited the specific allegations in his complaint. He cited the specific statements made by Spencer. Spencer did not cite any specific statements or third parties who were persuaded to walk away. (He admitted to the FL Bar he didn't know of any--not a very helpful admission, don't you agree?). Yet you think he will win and Wallace will lose. You've seen nothing specific and no proof from Spencer. Why do you like his case? Just askin'