InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253253
Next 10
Followers 91
Posts 17875
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: zipjet post# 125963

Wednesday, 08/31/2011 9:31:43 AM

Wednesday, August 31, 2011 9:31:43 AM

Post# of 253253
The constraints of the a blocking patent are conceptually another thing - perhaps a different thing physically. The answer to that is something the court may opine.

No perhaps at all in this. Here is the Copax lable description:

Glatiramer acetate, the active ingredient of COPAXONE, consists of the acetate salts of synthetic polypeptides, containing four naturally occurring amino acids: L-glutamic acid, L-alanine, L-tyrosine, and L-lysine with an average molar fraction of 0.141, 0.427, 0.095, and 0.338, respectively



That comes out to 4.49:1.48:3.56:1, which is not 6:2:5:1 in my book.

How well this argument works in court is one issue, but it is obviously possible for mC to have the same molar fraction as Copaxone but not the described 6:2:5:1.

[BTW, the 6:2:5:1 relates to copolymer-1 in general, not the improved version. So this might not be a very strong argument if the process of excluding the big chains somewhat shifts these numbers]








Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.